🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Indigenous council members on NZ local authorities is set to be slashed by over 50%, after a controversial legislative amendment that forced municipal councils to submit the fate of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which can include one or more councillors based on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to give Māori electors the choice to vote for a guaranteed Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, local governments were only able to create a Indigenous seat by initially submitting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations often spent years generating community backing and pushing their local governments to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to set up a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying communities should decide whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation required councils that had created a electoral district under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on October 11. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their wards, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

The results represented “a crucial move in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has stated it wants to end “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the referendums were split down city-country divisions – most urban centers required to vote supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

This year’s local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are able to create different wards – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The different conditions applied to Indigenous representation indicated the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that chose to retain their wards.