🔗 Share this article

In my role as a game master, I traditionally steered clear of extensive use of randomization during my D&D games. I tended was for the plot and session development to be guided by deliberate decisions as opposed to random chance. That said, I chose to try something different, and I'm very pleased with the outcome.

The Spark: Observing 'Luck Rolls'

A popular podcast showcases a DM who frequently calls for "fate rolls" from the adventurers. He does this by choosing a specific dice and assigning potential outcomes contingent on the result. This is essentially no unlike rolling on a random table, these are devised in the moment when a course of events has no obvious outcome.

I opted to test this technique at my own table, mostly because it seemed interesting and offered a departure from my normal practice. The outcome were fantastic, prompting me to reflect on the perennial tension between planning and improvisation in a tabletop session.

A Memorable Session Moment

At a session, my players had concluded a large-scale fight. When the dust settled, a cleric character wondered if two beloved NPCs—a sibling duo—had lived. Rather than choosing an outcome, I let the dice decide. I told the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. I defined the outcomes as: on a 1-4, both were killed; on a 5-9, only one would die; a high roll, they both lived.

The die came up a 4. This resulted in a incredibly emotional sequence where the party discovered the corpses of their allies, still united in their final moments. The cleric held funeral rites, which was uniquely powerful due to previous story developments. As a final reward, I decided that the forms were miraculously transformed, revealing a magical Prayer Bead. I randomized, the bead's contained spell was perfectly what the party lacked to resolve another major situation. One just script this type of magical coincidences.

Honing On-the-Spot Skills

This experience led me to ponder if randomization and spontaneity are in fact the core of this game. While you are a prep-heavy DM, your improvisation muscles need exercise. Groups frequently take delight in ignoring the most detailed narratives. Therefore, a good DM has to be able to pivot effectively and fabricate scenarios in real-time.

Using on-the-spot randomization is a excellent way to practice these talents without straying too much outside your comfort zone. The strategy is to use them for small-scale circumstances that don't fundamentally change the campaign's main plot. For instance, I would not employ it to decide if the main villain is a secret enemy. However, I might use it to figure out if the PCs enter a room right after a major incident unfolds.

Enhancing Player Agency

This technique also works to make players feel invested and create the feeling that the adventure is alive, evolving based on their actions as they play. It prevents the perception that they are merely pawns in a DM's sole narrative, thereby enhancing the cooperative foundation of the game.

Randomization has always been integral to the core of D&D. Original D&D were reliant on charts, which made sense for a game focused on exploration. While current D&D frequently prioritizes story and character, leading many DMs to feel they need exhaustive notes, this isn't always the required method.

Striking the Right Balance

There is absolutely no problem with doing your prep. Yet, it's also fine nothing wrong with stepping back and letting the rolls to decide some things in place of you. Authority is a major part of a DM's job. We require it to facilitate play, yet we often struggle to give some up, at times when doing so can lead to great moments.

My final suggestion is this: Don't be afraid of letting go of control. Try a little randomness for inconsequential details. The result could find that the unexpected outcome is infinitely more powerful than anything you might have scripted in advance.